Video Game Violence – Do We Even Need A Debate?

This article, combined with Leigh Alexander’s comments on it, have provoked this post. The article is factually fine – some children are impressionable, and watching Modern Warfare 2’s sanitised, Hollywood War On Terror is, inevitably, going to create a small – and I cannot stress this enough, a very small – proportion of people who are going to look at it, think “Wow, this is awesome!” and walk into their local gun store the next day to load up.

THe problem with this article is that it assumes (as does M.I.A., the controversial rapper it quotes) that children are walking into GAME and HMV and picking these games off the shelf, then prancing home, playing them 24/7, and being turned into murder drones ready to go to war. The fact is, it’s not like that. I can’t speak for the US, having not lived there in a long time, but currently, I, a man perfectly within my rights to go and buy an 18-rated game, still have to bring I.D. and prove my identity. I don’t doubt that some stores are less scrupulous, but make no mistake, the greatest cause of children acquiring games that they shouldn’t is their parents. 13-Year-Old Johnny sees Dave, whose parents don’t know or don’t care, flashing Modern Medal Manshoot Murder Kill Storm 3 – The Face-Blastination around in the playground, and suddenly Johnny has to have it, Mum, pleasepleaseplease! The issue is not that these games are too violent for children – they undoubtedly are, and they are marketed as such and sold with a clear 18 rating (something no-one can complain about with the advent – at last – of a unified game age rating system in the UK) – the problem is parents who either:

  • Don’t know that they’re buying a game with such content.
  • Don’t care that they’re buying a game with such content (and I am willing to believe this is a very small number).
  • Cave into their child’s protestations of peer pressure created by the above.

Leigh Alexander, of the excellent Sexy Videogameland, suggested via Tweet that 18 was an impressionable age in any case – which raises the question, what IS a suitable age for people to be buying games like Gears of War 2, Modern Warfare 2: any game with graphic violence? Do we raise or create a new category of 21+? Experience of living about 5 minutes from a university campus suggests to me that there are just as many man-children aged 21 likely to think violence is awesome after dropping their tactical nuke as there are 18-year olds. Likewise, I know a lot of incredibly mature 18 year olds who can enjoy Modern Warfare 2, but will sit in visible shock when watching, for instance, the Wikileaks video that apparently showed a US Apache firing on unarmed reporters (mistakenly).

The issues with video game violence, then, are not that it exists, and that it is reaching unparalleled heights of graphical realism (albeit nowhere near photorealistic, no matter what the Daily Mail might scream); the issue is that some few video game stores aren’t enforcing the law (and the UK is generally very good on this – it’s a small minority), that parents are caving into their children’s claim to “need” these games for playground cred, and that people who are naturally unsuited to deal with virtual realities such as these are being exposed to them. Give someone with suicidal tendencies a razor-blade and hurl abuse at them for 5 hours, and they’re likely to self-harm. Give someone with an inability to differentiate reality and fantasy sufficiently an AR-15, then sit them in front of Modern Warfare 2 or it’s ilk for the 5 hour duration of the single player, and their mental problem will, similarly, come to light.

Can we necessarily stop parents buying 18 rated games for younger children? No. But we cannot, should not, then attack the makers of those games when young children grow up and decide to join the military, or mentally unstable people are influenced by those games to the point where they do something horrible. And the final suggestion of that Joystick Division article, that “If even one kid gets nudged towards war by a video game then, in a very real way, the people who make and support war games have blood on their hands — the kind that doesn’t fade away into forgotten pixels after a minute or two” is frankly ludicrous. The idea that anyone of sound mental judgment would base a career decision that will affect their entire future, and risk their life, based on the fact they quite like the bit where you shoot the man in the face with the bullets, is a huge leap to make, and precisely the kind of logic that should not be given credence when discussing this subject.

Advertisements
  1. Argh, it’s a real pain. I tried to get in contact with GAME and HMV about how they’re trying to deal with it. But nobody replied.

    On my to do list is to go into the store and refuse to leave until I get an appointment with the manager and get to speak with them about this.

    Of course, I am a wuss so that won’t happen

      • Kid A
      • June 25th, 2010

      Well, I have something to do after my last 2 exams now.

      • Shall we join arms and get them to answer questions about what they do to combat this?

        I’m sure that will go well…

        • Kid A
        • June 26th, 2010

        We’re not joining arms. a) You’re a bit of trek away from me b) I don’t like you in that way.

    • Nersh
    • June 26th, 2010

    You know, that article was fairly balanced and (while I disagreed with a lot of what it was saying) made sense.

    And then, out of the blue in the last paragraph, without any indication as to how the writer managed to arrive at his frighteningly-beyond-all-logic conclusion, it said that game developers were basically guilty of manslaughter? I wasn’t aware that that was how you were supposed to structure an argument.

      • Nersh
      • June 26th, 2010

      Also, how come Kid gets a wonderful picture of his mug?

        • Kid A
        • June 27th, 2010

        Kid bothered to give himself a proper avatar on his WordPress account.

        And, y’know, I’m preeetty.

      • Yeah, basically, I can’t be arsed. I’ll do one over this week…

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: